[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Assignment between strong pointers
- To: <eric@son-of-blob>, <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Assignment between strong pointers
- From: Michael McClary <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 89 13:42:08 PST
- Cc: <xtech@son-of-blob>
> From eric@son-of-blob Tue Nov 7 12:33:17 1989
> From: mark@xxxxxxxxxxx (Mark S. Miller)
> Overall, my impression is that our source code in C++ is going to
> start looking rather awkward (not simply as a result of the above, but
> cumulatively from all the little problems). This makes developing in
> Smalltalk that much more attractive (keep the source clean; hide cruft
> in the translator). Unfortunately some of us are stuck for a while.
> The thought of having the translator take care of this stuff for the Smalltalk
> stuff has been a major factor that has allowed me to sleep at night while
> adding all this apparently necessary cruft to the language. Unfortunately,
> there are probably people in the outside world who aren't going to want to
> use Smalltalk.
Also in the inside world. Not that I have anything against Smalltalk,
but you may recall my agreement to go with coding in C++ was with the
understanding this would be the LAST new language to learn before first
product. Do you now intend to promote Smalltalk from a prototyping tool
for the architects to the main coding platform?