[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: onward
- From: ted@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 95 19:29:46 JST
- Reply-to: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From avatar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Nov 22 07:12:36 1995
> Subject: RE: "xurl?
> To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: xanadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: oster@xxxxxxxxxx (David Phillip Oster)
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:21:17 -0800
> Sender: avatar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Content-Length: 228
> Naturally, in a project like this I don't want to re-invent the wheel.
> To write your Mac product, I'll need access to the relevant technical specs,
> and where those specs don't exist, we'll need to write at least a first
My schedule: CATCH UP through Monday.
Week in Tokyo.
Catch up some more.
May or may not get stuff out to you before that trip.
Keep reminding me.
P.S. Excellent arguments are coming in both for and against
putting the protocol under http. Perhaps we should try it both ways.